Integrating Political and Social Issues in Operations and Supply Management
Michael Maloni (Kennesaw State University)
« Comment here on "Perspectives on the Productivity Dilemma" | Main | Comment Here on "When is a conceptual framework also a theoretical contribution?" »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e55208328e88330115711a3fdb970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Comment Here on "Integrating Political and Social Issues in Operations and Supply Management":
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
I think Mike Maloni raises some very interesting points in his essay. One of the great benefits of tenure is the ability to start debates and stir the pot. Unfortunately, often the easier path is to stay away from issues that might be uncomfortable.
It seems to me that we (academics) ought to try to introduce topics to the classroom for consideration. Here is one - I have often stood in line at a fast food restaurant and watched the employees put on gloves to make food, make the food, then take the gloves off. This makes sense from an operations and economics perspective - the managers of the restaurant want to limit the possibility of food contamination and gloves are cheap. However, these is a huge waste of resources - the latex and plastic in the gloves gets thrown in landfills. So, here's a question - should we discuss things like this in class and examine how/why companies make decisions that may be good for the bottom line but bad for the environment?
I think the answer should be yes. How about we start here with a little online discussion of the issue. Does anyone else have an example of an operationally sound decision that might not be great for the environment?
Posted by: Kenneth Boyer | July 01, 2009 at 11:13 AM